After I read Howard’s article on internet plagarism, I found myself thinking back to “the Machine is us/ing us” video. In the end of the video, it typed out that “we’ll need to rethink copyright” and that is one of the many ideas Howard suggests. Though I find his article a little jumbled and packed with a lot of thoughts in not a lot of text, this was one I found the most interesting. In this internet age, people have access to more information then ever before, quicker, and more conveniently. Conventional idea of copyright and originality seem to fail slightly in the wake of an internet that everyone can edit. Think about wikipedia. Anyone can edit and write in it, and it is clear that thousands of people have put hundreds, maybe thousands of hours of work into, yet they take no credit and demand no copyright money. In fact, they leave anyone open to add or change their information at will. I think Wikipedia is the first example of an internet-adapted world, where text is shared, rather then enviously hoarded with ideas such as ‘copyrighting.’ Howard also mentions the internet has sped up and increased the amount of intertextuality that happens in the world, and I think this is completely true as well. And with this increase of intertextuality comes the erosion of the concept of personal holdings on any piece or idea. As Howard suggests, plagarism may be easier or harder – most certainly more expensive, if one 6-page paper costs $68 – but in this day and age, it is more different then anything else. And I think the concept of plagarism and copyright will have to be rethought to adapt to the way our culture takes, gives, and edits at will where the internet is concerned.
Do students these days plagiarism more then they used do? Who knows?